About our Einstein Research Unit

Our Einstein Research Unit “Coping with Affective Polarization – How Civil Society Fosters Social Cohesion” is dedicated to the interdisciplinary study of affective polarisation and ways of constructively dealing with its consequences. Our scientific team consists of researchers from the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, the Freie Universität Berlin and the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

We are dedicated to making our research visible to the public and translating our insights into practical applications across social contexts. Therefore, we collaborate with our partners from civil society to learn from their practical experiences and facilitate a mutual exchange between science and the public.

Our Research Unit is part of the Berlin University Alliance and funded by the Einstein Foundation Berlin.

Background
Affective Polarization

Polarization plays a key role in current debates about growing tensions and divisions within societies.
One especially important form is affective polarization – when people feel closer to those who share their views and develop strong negative feelings or dismissive attitudes toward those who think differently. This “us versus them” mindset can seriously harm societies. For example, it makes it harder for people with different views or interests to work together or find common ground. As a result, affective polarization can lead to greater intolerance, rude or hateful behavior, and even political violence – putting democracy at risk. In this context, our consortium seeks to answer the crucial question: How can we, as a society, deal with affective polarization and reduce its negative effects?

Social Cohesion as a Resource

We believe that social cohesion is a crucial resource in coping with the negative effects of affective polarization.
A cohesive society fosters dialogue, mutual understanding, and civic engagement, enabling individuals and groups of people to navigate conflicts without deepening political and social divisions. Strengthening these qualities can help reduce affective polarization and its harmful consequences.

The Role of Civil Society

Civil society plays an important part in strengthening social cohesion. Organizations such as NGOs and activist groups help bridge divides through their work on the ground and community involvement. That is why we work closely with civil society partners, combining their practical experience with our research. Together, we develop and test strategies to strengthen cohesion across social and political divides and help reduce the harmful effects of affective polarization.

Overarching Research Questions and Aims
  • How pronounced is affective polarization in Germany? To what extent and under which circumstances does it change over time?

  • What factors influence affective polarization among individuals and groups from civil society? How are the effects of affective polarization dealt with at the individual level, in social interactions and in activist groups?

  • How can social cohesion act as a resource for coping constructively with affective polarization? In what ways can civil society effectively mobilize cohesion to mitigate the negative consequences of affective polarization?

The investigation of these overarching research questions is facilitated by the development and establishment of a large data infrastructure, focused interdisciplinary empirical research, and a common interest in developing interventions involving actors from civil society. Specifically, we strive to answer these questions by realizing the following overarching aims:

A central aim is the development and establishment of the Berlin Polarization Monitor, which serves as a data infrastructure to continuously measure the dynamics of affective polarization based on a large-scale panel study. The Berlin Polarization Monitor is intended to measure the degree of polarization and the associated emotions for a variety of topics and thus act as a kind of social seismograph.

Our interdisciplinary empirical research strives to understand the dynamics of affective polarization over time by analyzing the mechanisms and factors that influence affective polarization. Using a variety of research methods, we aim to identify strategies to cope with affective polarization at the level of the individual, social interactions and civil society groups.

Building on our research, we aim to develop interventions that position civil society as a central actor in addressing the negative effects of affective polarization and strengthening social cohesion. In close collaboration with our partners from civil society, we will co-design a range of intervention strategies and adapt them to fit their everyday contexts.

Illustration Coping with Affective Polarization
Research Perspectives

We approach our research questions from an interdisciplinary perspective, bringing together expertise from a wide range of scientific fields:

  • Psychology

  • Political Science
  • Sociology

  • Psychiatry

  • Philosophy

  • Communication Science

Drawing on these disciplines, we use diverse theoretical frameworks and rigorous research methods, such as surveys, interviews, and media analysis, to study affective polarisation and to explore strategies to mitigate it.

A key aspect of our work is actively incorporating the perspectives of civil society actors. We are particularly interested in their experiences with the consequences of affective polarization and the approaches they employ to address it. Using participatory research methods, we collaborate with our partners from civil society to co-develop effective intervention strategies.

Illustration des Logos Coping with Affective Polarization
Main Concepts in a Nutshell

Interested in exploring further? Browse the questions below for brief descriptions of our shared understanding of the core concepts that guide our research.

When it comes to political parties or debates, people often feel more connected to those who share their views – and more distant or even hostile toward those who do not. This phenomenon is called affective polarization. It goes beyond mere disagreement; it involves emotional attachment to one’s own group and negative feelings towards those with opposing views. Affective polarization can be directed at political parties, but it can also arise in response to specific policy issues that trigger strong emotions – such as climate change, migration, or abortion. One such example was the Covid-19 pandemic, during which people often felt emotionally aligned with one of two groups: those in favor of protective measures like vaccinations and mask mandates, and those who opposed them.

Affective polarization differs from other kinds of polarization. While ideological polarization, for example, refers to growing differences in beliefs and policy opinions, affective polarization is about how people feel about others with similar or different views.

Affective polarization can have profound societal consequences, threatening the glue that holds societies together. This cohesive glue relies on the ability to cooperate and find compromise across conflicting interest groups and political positions. Essential democratic values such as tolerance, mutual trust, and confidence in governmental institutions are key to maintaining a stable and functioning society. However, affective polarization threatens these foundations by fostering hostility and devaluation of those with differing views. As social divisions deepen, societies and institutions risk being perceived as well as treated in strictly antagonistic terms of “us versus them,” fueling behaviors such as hate speech, political violence, and incivility.

Social cohesion can be conceptualized from various perspectives. From our point of view, it refers to how individuals and groups connect with one another – through shared activities, communication, and everyday social interactions. Importantly, the concept of social cohesion does not imply the absence of conflict. Rather, it assumes that the ways in which conflicting interests and worldviews are expressed, negotiated, resolved, or prolonged play a crucial role in shaping the emergence, maintenance, or erosion of cohesion.

From this perspective, cohesion can be seen as a society’s capacity to manage – and actively mitigate – the potentially harmful effects of affective polarization. This involves examining whether and how societies provide the resources and opportunities needed for meaningful interaction both within and across polarized groups. For instance, do we have spaces where people from different backgrounds and with divergent perspectives can come together for genuine conversation and shared experience?

The concept of civil society has a long tradition in political thought and public debate. It is often associated with ideas of the common good or desirable forms of human interaction. In our research, we adopt a less normative and more practical approach. We define civil society as the broad spectrum of voluntary associations that exist between the state and the market. These groups range from recreational clubs (e.g., local sports clubs) and community groups focused on environmental or human rights issues to social movements and protest networks.

Civil society is not a single, unified actor – it includes organizations with diverse, and sometimes competing, goals. What they share is their voluntary nature and their role in shaping social and political life. Civil society groups contribute to democratic participation, foster public debate, and can influence policies through advocacy and mobilization.

About the Einstein Foundation

Our Einstein Research Unit “Coping with Affective Polarization – How Civil Society Fosters Social Cohesion” is funded by the Einstein Foundation Berlin, a foundation that aims to promote cutting-edge scientific research and establish inter- and transdisciplinary networks in strategically important research fields among members of the Berlin University Alliance. The research grant number is ERU-2023-78.

For more information please visit:
www.einsteinfoundation.de

Discover more about us
Discover more about us