{"id":1721,"date":"2018-06-27T16:45:14","date_gmt":"2018-06-27T14:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ethnoserver.hu-berlin.de\/sts\/?page_id=1721"},"modified":"2021-06-15T12:50:02","modified_gmt":"2021-06-15T10:50:02","slug":"dzeneta-hodzic","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www2.hu-berlin.de\/sts\/people\/current-members\/dzeneta-hodzic\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u017eeneta Hod\u017ei\u0107"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"D\u017eeneta<\/p>\n

I am a research fellow at the Institute for Social-Ecological Research (ISOE) in Frankfurt\/Main and a PhD candidate in Cultural Anthropology\/European Ethnology at Goethe University Frankfurt\/Main. My doctoral research project is part of the inter-\/transdisciplinary junior research group \u201cregulate \u2013 Regulation of Groundwater in Telecoupled Social-Ecological Systems\u201d. In my dissertation I aim to study (un-)regulated practices of groundwater use and management in two case studies in the Western Balkans: Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina.<\/p>\n

Prior to this, I was a student assistant at the Berlin Social Science Center and at the Institute for European Ethnology at Humboldt-Universit\u00e4t zu Berlin, where I completed both my BA and MA in European Ethnology.\u00a0 My MA thesis ethnographically explored how (EU-) policy on renewable energy is implemented locally in Bosnia and Hercegovina and how this relates to socio-technical imaginaries and environmental knowledge.<\/p>\n

I am interested in environmental anthropology, ethnography of bureaucracy, policy and institutions and the anthropology of science and technology (STS).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Contact: hodzic@isoe.de<\/a><\/p>\n

Find me also at: ISOE<\/a> | regulate<\/a><\/p>\n

Publications<\/h1>\n
<\/a><\/form>

2022<\/h3>

D\u017eeneta Hod\u017ei\u0107, Hana Curak<\/p>

Daytonitis in Practice (Post-)Socialist (Dis-)Continuities in Bosnia and Herzegovina\u2019s Energy and Environment Sector <\/a> Journal Article<\/span> <\/p>

In: <\/span>Berliner Bl\u00e4tter, <\/span>vol. 85, <\/span>pp. 87-95, <\/span>2022<\/span>.<\/p>

Abstract<\/a><\/span> | Links<\/a><\/span><\/p>

@article{Hod\u017ei\u01072022,
\r\ntitle = {Daytonitis in Practice (Post-)Socialist (Dis-)Continuities in Bosnia and Herzegovina\u2019s Energy and Environment Sector },
\r\nauthor = {D\u017eeneta Hod\u017ei\u0107 and Hana Curak},
\r\nurl = {https:\/\/www.berliner-blaetter.de\/index.php\/blaetter\/article\/view\/1092},
\r\ndoi = {10.18452\/23999 },
\r\nyear  = {2022},
\r\ndate = {2022-03-01},
\r\nurldate = {2022-03-01},
\r\njournal = {Berliner Bl\u00e4tter},
\r\nvolume = {85},
\r\npages = {87-95},
\r\nabstract = {Dieser ethnografische Beitrag arbeitet Spuren der Zeitlichkeit in Alltagsverst\u00e4ndnissen von Beamt*innen in Bosnien und Herzegowinas (BiH) Energie- und Umweltsektor heraus um zu verstehen, was living in the post f\u00fcr sie bedeutet. Basierend auf ethnografischer Feldforschung in staatlichen Institutionen kontrastieren wir etablierte zeitliche, periodische Klassifizierungen wie Postsozialismus und Nachkriegszeit mit einem kontingenten Europ\u00e4isierungsprozess des Staates. Ausgehend von anthropologischer Forschung in der Region welche aufzeigt wie diese Zeiteinteilungen von Alltagspraktiken herausgefordert werden, zeigen wir auf wie Beamt*innen stattdessen Europ\u00e4isierung und Jugostalgie als zeitliche Marker referenzieren um Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft zu ordnen. Gleichzeitig diskutieren wir die Beziehung dieser referenzierten Nuancen multipler Zeitlichkeiten und wie sich dies analytisch zur Dayton Meantime (Jansen, 2015) und der analytischen Produktivit\u00e4t von Postsozialismus verh\u00e4lt.
\r\n
\r\nThe aim of this ethnographic paper is to map the traces of temporality in everyday practices of energy and environment professionals in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). In line with current anthropological research in the region, we aim to illustrate how clear divisions of time in BiH between post-socialism, post-war and an undetermined Europeanization process do  not  adequately  address  the  nuances  of  multiple  temporalities  the  interlocutors  referen-ce.  Based  on  long-term  ethnographic  fieldwork  in  state  institutions,  we  attempt  to  unders-tand what living in the post entails for civil servants in BiH\u2019s energy and environment sector. Specifically, we look at how temporal markers relate to the Dayton Meantime (Jansen 2015), especially in the context of Europeanization and Yugostalgia. Discussing the analytic produc-tivity of postsocialism, working out certain (dis-)continuities, we focus on how civil servants employ  references  of  Europeanization  and  Yugostalgia  as  temporal  markers  through  which  they make sense of their past, present and future.},
\r\nkeywords = {},
\r\npubstate = {published},
\r\ntppubtype = {article}
\r\n}
\r\n<\/pre><\/div>
Close<\/a><\/p><\/div>
Dieser ethnografische Beitrag arbeitet Spuren der Zeitlichkeit in Alltagsverst\u00e4ndnissen von Beamt*innen in Bosnien und Herzegowinas (BiH) Energie- und Umweltsektor heraus um zu verstehen, was living in the post f\u00fcr sie bedeutet. Basierend auf ethnografischer Feldforschung in staatlichen Institutionen kontrastieren wir etablierte zeitliche, periodische Klassifizierungen wie Postsozialismus und Nachkriegszeit mit einem kontingenten Europ\u00e4isierungsprozess des Staates. Ausgehend von anthropologischer Forschung in der Region welche aufzeigt wie diese Zeiteinteilungen von Alltagspraktiken herausgefordert werden, zeigen wir auf wie Beamt*innen stattdessen Europ\u00e4isierung und Jugostalgie als zeitliche Marker referenzieren um Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft zu ordnen. Gleichzeitig diskutieren wir die Beziehung dieser referenzierten Nuancen multipler Zeitlichkeiten und wie sich dies analytisch zur Dayton Meantime (Jansen, 2015) und der analytischen Produktivit\u00e4t von Postsozialismus verh\u00e4lt.
\r\n
\r\nThe aim of this ethnographic paper is to map the traces of temporality in everyday practices of energy and environment professionals in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). In line with current anthropological research in the region, we aim to illustrate how clear divisions of time in BiH between post-socialism, post-war and an undetermined Europeanization process do  not  adequately  address  the  nuances  of  multiple  temporalities  the  interlocutors  referen-ce.  Based  on  long-term  ethnographic  fieldwork  in  state  institutions,  we  attempt  to  unders-tand what living in the post entails for civil servants in BiH\u2019s energy and environment sector. Specifically, we look at how temporal markers relate to the Dayton Meantime (Jansen 2015), especially in the context of Europeanization and Yugostalgia. Discussing the analytic produc-tivity of postsocialism, working out certain (dis-)continuities, we focus on how civil servants employ  references  of  Europeanization  and  Yugostalgia  as  temporal  markers  through  which  they make sense of their past, present and future.<\/div>
Close<\/a><\/p><\/div>